As a culture, our golden calf is young people: their presence, whims, fashions, and thoughts. Advertisers certainly know this. MTV does. The head of MTV once said, “We don’t shoot for young people, we own them.” Everyone wants young people. The church is no different.
The identity politics at the UMC General Conference 2012 has been troubling. Our church has been in decline since 1968 when it formed, and yet our structure has remained the same: a multiplicity of corporate-style boards with redundant agendas, massive bureaucracies, and little oversight. The economic and cultural realities are such that we as a church can no longer fund this corporate beast. Attempting to make any changes, however, has proven difficult. Tribalism is rampant. Each group is asking, “Who made that plan?” “Why wasn’t I at the table?” “Did you think about this group?” “Were they consulted?”
At one point in the deliberations, someone actually said, “I want everyone who wrote this legislation to stand up so I can see who they are.” Read: it matters little whether or not the legislation is good or effective, it matters if the people who wrote it look like me.
To be certain, we are a worldwide communion, a big-tent denomination if there ever was one. We have many voices that need to be honored, many constituencies that are a gift to Christ’s church and the Wesleyan movement. I had enough schooling to know that social location matters. I don’t think it should matter more than faithfulness to Christ or zeal for fulfilling his mission, but that is a separate debate.
One of the strangest things in all of this has been the idolatry of the young in our church. I’ve seen it at all levels. “Why aren’t there more young delegates at General Conference?” they ask. Well, to get elected to GC involves being known by a lot of your peers, and this likelihood increases as one is around for longer periods of time.
Most troubling is the reversal of the locus of wisdom in our culture. Ancient societies and even Americans of recent generations revered the old; we looked up to their witness, honored their accumulated knowledge, deferred to their experience and listened to their voices. That day is gone. We want the young: to know their thoughts, to have them present, to follow their lead.
As a young pastor in a church that has few of them, I’ve seen this repeatedly. “What do the young adults think??” “How do we get more young adults??” We are desperate for young clergy and desperate for youth and young adult representation in the church. Granted, the Oxford Methodists were young when they got going; however, anyone who knows the story of the Wesleys is well aware that they were very unusual 20-somethings by the standards of any age.
So why all this fuss about young people sitting at the leadership table? Frankly, I don’t get it. I’ve been a pastor now for just under three years and I have very little wisdom about the church to share. I’m still learning, studying, figuring out how all this actually works. A big deal was made of GC 2016 being after school was out so more young adults could attend. For what? Honestly, other than for the sake of appearances, what are 20-somethings going to contribute? (Again, note: I am one of them.) Let the conferences send their best and brightest, their wisest folks, most effective in a diversity of roles: large and small church, campus ministry, chaplaincy, peace and justice ministries, district superintendents. That is a range of experience that would matter. Those are gifts that could serve the church. What we’re doing now is little more than parroting the worst in tribalistic American politics.
Would you want a 19-year-old brain surgeon operating on you? Would you want a 26-year-old to be President? Me neither. Nor do I want a large number of 20-somethings, who have proven to be effective at little (if anything), to be making decisions for the worldwide communion of people called United Methodists.